| |
Better Science
IX. CRUELTY-FREE IN VITRO
In vitro alternatives are generally accepted as
more humane replacements for animal-based procedures. However, it
is not widely known that in vitro techniques may not necessarily
be cruelty-free. Cells used in such cultures may be directly derived
from non-human animals. To be cruelty-free, human or existing animal
cell lines should be the source for all cells, tissues and organs
used in research and testing.
It is also common for cell cultures (and most organ and tissue
cultures) to be created with primary cells (cells derived from recently
killed animals) rather than immortalized cells. Thus every time
a culture is started, one or more animals may be killed. To be cruelty-free,
all in vitro techniques should utilize only immortalized animal
cells or primary human cells, tissues and organs.
Even if the cells are immortalized or of human origin, there remains
the concerns created by supplements added to the culture media to
promote the growth and survival of the cells, tissues and/or organs.
There are a variety of bioactive compounds used as supplements,
with the most serious problems being associated with the production
and use of fetal calf serum (FCS) or serum from other animals. FCS
production involves conditions associated with high levels of cruelty,
pain and distress including, but not limited to, puncturing the
heart and draining all of the blood from unanesthetized animals.
To be cruelty-free, in vitro methods must utilize cells, tissues
and organs specifically adapted to serum-free culture media or the
use of supplements derived from in vitro production techniques or
human blood serum. Although readily available, such alternative
sources of cell and tissue growth supplements are often ignored
due to reliance on more familiar or traditional animal-based production
methods.
<< Back To Contents | Next
Section >>
|
|