NEAVS Home
 
ESEC Home
 
About ESEC
 
Animals in
Education
 
Alternatives to
Dissection
 
Humane Science
Curriculum
 
Student
Concerns
 
Kids' Corner
 
Tools for
Teachers
 
Careers in Science
& Medicine
 
What You Might Not Know
 
Legislation
 
ESEC Responds
 
ESEC FAQs
 
Contact ESEC
 
Links
 
ESEC Site Map
 Image of frog

Careers in Science & Medicine

Keeping Girls and Women
in the Sciences

Commentary based on a 1998 National Science Foundation report:

"Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering," a 1998 report of the National Science Foundation (NSF), found that while fourth and eighth grade girls have similar self-perceptions to boys regarding achievement in science, women earned only 31 percent of the total science and engineering doctoral degrees in 1995.
"Some groups – women, minorities, and persons with disabilities – traditionally have not been fully represented in science and engineering. Although progress has been made in achievement and participation of some of these groups, this progress has not been consistent, and full representation has not been achieved," the report concluded.

Clearly, something keeps these scientifically curious 13 and 14 year-old girls from pursuing science education to the same degree as their male counterparts. One may reject the notion that the onset of adolescence alone is responsible. A 1994 study found that girls are more likely to take high school biology than boys (95 percent vs. 92 percent.)

While the NSF report does not address the use of dissection, science teachers and student advocates alike affirm that those most likely to seek alternatives to dissection are girls. Anecdotal evidence suggests that girls who are forced to dissect – or who experience difficulties in implementing alternatives to dissection – may reject the possibility of further study in biology despite any inherent interest.

The following are testimonies submitted to the Ethical Science and Education Coalition (ESEC) from female students in Waquoit, Ludlow, Fall River, Walpole, Spencer, and Hopkinton, Massachusetts, regarding their experience with dissection:

  • "[Science] used to be my favorite subject."
  • "I never took another class in biology [after dissection]."
  • "I just felt that if I wasn’t involved in science I wouldn’t have to [dissect].
  • "I know I would never [pursue] a career that required dissection."
  • "I was going to school to be a vet and [in] the 1st class (biology) I had to dissect a lot of things … in the future I would have [had] to dissect a cat and that was where I said ‘no way’—I can’t do this any more."
  • "Previously, I’d wanted to be a veterinarian. Science classes were always my favorite. I chose not to take a science class my senior year and took computer science instead of a lab science in college. I was appalled at the disrespect for life [that was] demonstrated."

Women comprise 51 percent of the U.S. population and 46 percent of the U.S. work force; however, the NSF report found that women account for only 22 percent of scientists and engineers in the work force.

And, according to the American Medical Association’s Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the United States, only 22 percent of physicians in the United States are women.

Passage of Dissection Choice Legislation in Massachusetts is one more way that the educational community can recognize and accommodate the needs of female science students while offering a comparable foundation in the sciences. This legislation is one more avenue to encourage the further pursuit of science education by women.

 

  

Fact Sheets    Animals in Veterinary Medicine | Keeping Girls and Women in the Sciences

<< Back to Careers in Science & Medicine | Home

  
ESEC logo and information

ESEC Fact Sheets You will need Adobe Reader to view these files. Download the FREE Adobe Reader for PDF files here.
Careers in Science & Medicine

Order your copy of
NEAVS’ Viewpoints Series

Experts in the fields of psychology, medicine and surgery, and veterinary medicine reflect on why and how they have come to be anti-vivisectionists. Their critical thinking builds a powerful case for the wisdom and necessity of ending unethical and scientifically unsound animal experimentation.


How you can support NEAVS today!

Your support saves animal and human lives.

FYI
The State of the Anti-Vivisection Movement in America