NEAVS Home
 
ESEC Home
 
About ESEC
 
Animals in
Education
 
Alternatives to
Dissection
 
Humane Science
Curriculum
 
Student
Concerns
 
Kids' Corner
 
Tools for
Teachers
 
Careers in Science
& Medicine
 
What You Might Not Know
 
Legislation
 
ESEC Responds
 
ESEC FAQs
 
Contact ESEC
 
Links
 
ESEC Site Map
 Image of frog

 

 

Student Concerns

Model Dissection Choice Policy

Developing ethical sensitivity in students is to be encouraged and, thus, students’ values or beliefs regarding dissection must be respected. Students requesting an alternative lesson plan should be granted their request without any pressure to do otherwise or with any negative consequences.

Dissection should be understood to be the cutting, killing, inspecting, touching, handling, preserving, mounting, or other manipulation of living or dead members of the Kingdom Animalia or their parts for scientific study.

These regulations will apply to all schools with students in the K-12 range. The following policy will be outlined in any and all curriculum guides that life science teachers receive:

A student’s grade will not be affected in any way by the student’s choice of an alternative to specimen dissection, nor will students who choose an alternative lesson be penalized or discriminated against for that choice in any other way.

Students should be informed of the availability of an alternative assignment. This notice should be included in relevant syllabi, student course selection guides, and should be posted in all science classrooms. In addition, science teachers will inform students of the option of an alternative not less than three weeks prior to the actual course exercise.

Alternative education projects, including, but not limited to, computer programs, plastic models, videos, charts, etc. will be available to all life science classes which incorporate dissection exercises.

The alternative project will require a student’s investment of time and energy comparable to that required by the original specimen dissection. Requiring more arduous effort on the part of the student than would have been required by the specimen dissection will be considered penalizing. In addition, not providing the student comparable depth and scope of learning would also be considered penalizing.

The burden should not be on the student to determine an alternative course of study. Students choosing the alternative will be given information on specific activities and resources to use as their alternative project. Teacher assistance will be available for all students who choose alternatives. "Watching" other students perform specimen dissection shall not be considered an appropriate alternative.

ESEC provides assistance to students, teachers, and administrators in the selection of alternative programs that are comparable or superior in cost, time, and educational value to specimen dissection.

We also provide guidance with the development of alternative lesson plans and can assist in the technical training of teachers and students when necessary.

 

 
  

Fact Sheets    Objecting to Dissection | Guidelines for Passing Choice Policies | Model Dissection Choice Policy | Girls and Women in Science | Special Needs Students & the Science Classroom | Psychological Effect on Students

<< Back to Student Concerns | Home

  

ESEC logo

ESEC FYI
"In high school, I was forced to dissect fetal pigs, frogs and cats. This in no way contributed to my future career as a veterinarian; and, in fact, nearly derailed my dreams." (Read more)
—Lorna Grande, DVM

"I am fortunate to practice a profession which gives me enormous pleasure, intellectual challenge, and even spiritual fulfillment. However, the path to gaining my credentials was laced with episodes that I found ethically disturbing and very sad." (Read more)
—Holly Cheever, DVM


 


How you can support NEAVS today!

Your support saves animal and human lives.
FYI
The State of the Anti-Vivisection Movement in America