Programs & Campaigns
A Voice for All Animals
Cats and NEAVS
Don't Fancy this Cat Fancy Article
June 29, 2001
Keith Bush
Managing Editor
Cat Fancy
P.O. Box 6050
Mission Viejo, CA 92690
Where did Cat Fancy acquire
the information for its August 2001 article "Catnaps
Boost Brainpower"? Certainly the author is not familiar
with this experiment by Michael Stryker and co-workers at
University of California, San Francisco. From your article
and the photo of the peaceful sleeping kitten one would assume
the kittens were in a harmless study—far from it!
In this single experiment alone, Stryker
and his co-vivisectors sutured one eye shut of 22 three-and-a-half-week-old
kittens. These kittens had stainless steel screws and wires
implanted into their brains. Kittens this young would typically
sleep most of the day. Most of these kittens, however, were
forced to stay awake by being on a "motorized
cage floor" for approximately 12 hours. If this isn’t
enough cruelty, the vivisectors also paralyzed and artificially
ventilated the kittens in preparation for brain recordings.
Lastly, the kitten’s brains were removed and examined.
Not only are Stryker’s experiments
cruel and a crude model of human brain development, they are
a very poor use of valuable research funds. Stryker has received
millions of your tax dollars since 1979 to experiment on kittens
and cats. From 1998 to 2000 alone he received one million
dollars for this long-term, unnecessary, unproductive, project.
We wish the kitten experiment was
as harmless as your article implies. However, your readers
deserve the truth. These kittens’ tortured, brief lives deserve
our compassion and our commitment to stop such atrocities.
These experimenters deserve our condemnation.
Sincerely,
Ann Stauble
Director of Research and Investigations
For further information, contact Melinda Everett, APR,
Director of Media and Public Relations: 617-523-6020 x17 or meverett@ma.neavs.com.
|