Home
 
About NEAVS
 
About ESEC
 
Shop NEAVS
 
Better Science
 
Cruelty-Free Living
 
Programs
& Campaigns
 
Resources
& Archives
 
Spreading
the Word
 
NEAVS
Responds
 
Helping & Giving
 
Contact Us
 
Media Inquiries
 
Links
 
Site Map
 Programs & Campaigns

Programs & Campaigns

A Message to People Who Care about Cats

It’s a crying shame. . .
what’s being done to cats in New England

Caged kittenIf you care about cats, here are some things you need to know.

Did you know that hundreds of cats are imprisoned in laboratory cages around New England — and thousands more throughout the country?

The following information may be shocking. But please, read on — the kittens and cats held in laboratories right now need your help.

Behind the Laboratory Door

NEAVS’ investigations recently found that Boston University, Harvard University, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, MIT, the University of Massachusetts Medical School, University of Connecticut, Rhode Island Hospital, Yale University and many others use cats in experiments paid for with YOUR tax dollars.

Here are just a few examples of what is going on behind closed doors:

  • At Boston University, Bertram Payne damages fetal, newborn, and older kittens’ and cats’ brains. Often, he makes them perform "tasks" to see how his inflicted brain damage affects them. He drills holes and breaks cats’ skulls open so he can manipulate their brains. Payne has received $3.6 million of YOUR tax dollars since 1986.

  • At Harvard University, J. Allan Hobson injects substances into the brains of awake and unanesthetized cats. He breaks cats’ skulls and implants electrodes in their brains and muscles to study sleep. Wires are tunneled under cats’ skin and run through their bodies. He has received approximately $3.5 million in tax money since 1992.

  • At Harvard University, Richard Clay Reid, who received approximately one million dollars between 1998-2000, places cats in restraining devices, paralyzes them and inserts electrodes in their eyes.

  • At Rhode Island Hospital, Piero Biancani has received over $2 million in tax money during the last five years to experiment on cats’ digestive tracts and gallbladders. Biancani puts catheters down cats’ throats and then pours acid into their esophagus to cause inflammation.

  • At the University of Massachusetts Medical School, David Paydarfar has received approximately one million dollars since 1999 to experiment on the breathing patterns of cats. Paydarfar’s experiments include placing cats on their backs with their heads in vises; threading instruments into their groins, windpipes and rectums; and cutting their necks open and crushing their carotid sinus nerves.
"Animal experimentation is not necessary. It is expensive. It is inaccurate. It is misleading. It consumes limited resources. And further, it is detrimental to the very species it professes to be working to help — humankind."
— Ray Greek, MD, and Jean Swingle Greek, DVM

But Aren’t These Animals Anesthetized?

Surgeries are typically done while animals are under anesthesia. But animals who are not intentionally killed when the surgery is over must endure a recovery period, as well as other post-surgical procedures.

Animals often have to live for years with injuries inflicted by experimenters.

These injuries can include brain damage; surgical alterations, such as having their eyes sewn shut; esophageal inflammation; and the implantation of electrodes in their brains and muscles.

Furthermore, in some experiments, the forms of anesthetics used are horribly outmoded, such as inhaled ether, rarely used in veterinary or in human medicine. Anesthetics must be expertly administered or they can result in animals "going light" and experiencing pain or awareness.

But Aren’t These Experiments Necessary to Save Human Lives?

No, absolutely not. There are better ways to study human physiology, disease, and injury than inducing disease or injury in a different species.

Clinical human studies, autopsies, epidemiology, human tissue studies, and imaging technology are only some of the better ways to study human health and disease. One doctor has remarked:

… due to known differences in neuroanatomy between humans and cats…animal models cannot prove hypotheses about humans."
— Stephen R. Kaufman, MD

Besides the Cats, Who Pays for These Deadly Experiments?

You, the taxpayer. In the past three years, approximately $15 million taxpayer dollars went into federally-funded cat experiments in the state of Massachusetts alone!

 

Dedicated to

Margaret Sarandrea and faithful compansion Emma

© 2002. Provided as a public service.


     
NEAVS logo

 

 

 

What YOU Can Do to Help

Join NEAVS and support our ongoing campaigns.
Visit our Web site at www.neavs.org for more information on becoming a supporter.

Distribute copies of this brochure.

Don’t have Web access?
Send a SASE for post cards and free copies of this flyer.
New England Anti-Vivisection Society (NEAVS)
333 Washington Street, Suite 850
Boston, Massachusetts 02108-5100