Programs & Campaigns
Animal Groups and Sanctuaries Respond to NIH Call for Comments
on Standards of Care for Chimpanzees
(Boston, MA) March 17, 2005 - In 2000 President Clinton signed
the Chimpanzee Health Improvement, Maintenance and Protection (CHIMP)
Act, the most significant part of which addressed the lifelong care
of chimpanzees owned by the federal government. Out of this legislation
a federally funded sanctuary system was created. Chimp
Haven was awarded the contract to provide for chimpanzees no longer
needed in laboratory research.
Now, years later, as Chimp Haven begins opening its doors to its
first arrivals of chimpanzees retired from research,
NIH posted the proposed regulations in preparation for public commentary.
Yesterday, in a 12 page letter to the Department of Health and Human
Service (DHHS), a division of the National Institutes of Health,
ten organizations joined efforts to present a comprehensive commentary
on the proposed regulations. The organizations, representing a combined
membership of more than $8.7 million Americans, included: the New
England Anti-Vivisection Society, Fauna Sanctuary, Save The Chimps,
Center for Great Apes, Laboratory Primate Advocacy Group, Primate
Rescue Center, Chimpanzee and Human Communication Institute, Humane
Society of the United States, and In Defense of Animals.
First and foremost, the comments called for Chimp Haven to be more
than just an enriched laboratory environment. Highlighting their
years of institutionalization, the letter called for Chimp Haven
to prioritize the needs of the individual chimpanzees over that
of the institution to provide for the emotional, sociological and
physical needs of this likely compromised population. For many if
not most of the chimpanzees, years or decades of use in experimental
protocols or breeding will have taken its toll.
The comments submitted to NIH also called for full disclosure of
the federally funded facility, including outside oversight by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Most importantly, the comments concluded:
The word sanctuary implies a place of permanent refuge and protection,
asylum, cover, harbor, or haven. We ask that DHHS agree to
provide any and all chimpanzees retired into the federal sanctuary
system with permanent protection from any further research.
Removing a chimpanzee from a sanctuary and putting him/her back
into a laboratory environment or research protocol [as current
language allows] is not retirement. We firmly believe that the
chimpanzees sent into retirement should be provided permanent
protection from further research as was the original intention
of the CHIMP Act. We believe that a sanctuary funded by public
tax dollars as well as private donations from the caring public
must be responsive to that public and their growing concerns for
greater protection and respect for chimpanzees.
Click
here for complete comments submitted to NIH
New England Anti-Vivisection Society
333 Washington Street Suite 850
Boston, MA 02108
ahall@neavs.org
617-523-6020 x 13
|