Programs & Campaigns
Statement of The New England Anti-Vivisection Society Regarding
Killing of Dogs by Tufts
(Boston, MA) January 2, 2004 -- The New England Anti-Vivisection
Society (NEAVS) is deeply saddened that the 5 dogs killed on New
Year's Day at Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine will
never have the opportunity to experience life as anything other
than objects of research. People were willing and waiting to give
them good homes.
NEAVS' statement reflects not only our anger and grief over this
killing but also our assessment of what gains were, nevertheless,
made and our promise of continued commitment to efforts at Tufts.
The success of this campaign is not lost in the needless killing
of these dogs, as hard as that loss is. Rather, there is a second
tier to this campaign that is a victory for students and animals
in labs everywhere.
The secrecy that covers what is done to animals in labs on the
Tufts campus, as well as at campuses and research institutions nationwide,
has once again been penetrated. Students found their courage and
their voice. They took the risk to counter attempts to silence them.
They made certain that the community at large had the opportunity
to let Tufts know how it felt about this kind of research. This
community, including caring scientific people, weighed in with an
emphatic NO.
While the internal dialogue Tufts offered its students proved futile
to resolution, the message from New England, the nation and even
other countries, let Tufts know that we all expect more from an
institution founded on principles of humane veterinary education,
practice and research.
Although Tufts wielded its power and killed the dogs, its actions
were witnessed and condemned as unacceptable. In the end, Tufts'
decision caused not just a loss of innocent life, but a loss of
its own reputation as well.
Given the voice of its founder, Dr. Jean Mayer, who denounced dog
experiments early in his career in favor of alternative methodologies;
given the work of former Dean Franklin Loew, who was committed to
bringing the issue of animal research to public debate; and given
the wishes of its students, both past and present, the current
administration has much to consider in setting the future course
for Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine.
If Tufts wishes to become a world center for biomedical research,
then it must listen to its community, which is saying loudly and
clearly: Tufts must not do the kind of research that is practiced
by status quo institutions everywhere. Tufts, to maintain its former
reputation and good will, must not participate in research that
causes suffering and death for millions of animals each year.
Tufts must be willing to lead by making certain that science is
no longer synonymous with animal suffering and death.
What we ask is scientifically do-able and ethically imperative.
If Tufts is, in fact, a healing institution for animals that go
through its front doors, then it must not be an institution
that brings animals through its back doors for such egregious
experiments as this bone-breaking study.
Instead, we are asking that Tufts commit its ample biomedical research
dollars, interest and faculty to non-invasive, non-lethal clinical
research and to research using or developing alternatives to the
use of living, feeling animals. We are asking that Tufts uphold
its reputation as the ethical signature school of veterinary medicine.
To that end, NEAVS will continue our campaign and remain available
and supportive to all current and future students, technicians,
faculty and administrators who are courageous and visionary enough
to pursue this noble goal and need our help in doing so.
01/02/04
New England Anti-Vivisection Society
(NEAVS)
Boston, MA
|